If the election board in the state of Florida had been consistent in
its rulings, in the election of 2000, there would never have been
any involvement by the U.S. Supreme Court. About ten days after the election
Fox News Network had an
interview with a Ms Green, that we
shall relate. Even CNN carried the story. But there was
never any follow up of this pertinent truth, during the ensuing days, trying to stay off the
determination of the party that wanted a recount. Our opinion is
that they wanted a revote, not a recount.
As it turned out, an attractive and very articulate African American,
a graduate from either Harvard or Yale if we recall correctly, about ten weeks or so, before
the national election, lost in a primary, in the state of Florida, for a
seat in the State House. Ms Green lost the primary by fourteen
votes. The state elections board denied her a recount on the
grounds that she
could not prove voter fraud or machine malfunction. That is the
law in the
state of Florida. Guess which
political party she is a member of? Hope you have time to read the
LAWS web page, on this site.
But because of the selfish desires of several people concerning
the presidential election, billions of dollars were spent, while the court proceedings grew
by leaps and bounds, all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Our opinion is that if the Florida State Supreme Court had done its job
by enforcing the election laws on the books in Florida at the time of
the election, rather than try to write new laws, the U.S. Supreme Court would never have been involved.
But due to the fact that they did over turn the decision of Judge Sander
Sauls, which tried a very entertaining court case, in which he gave the only
verdict available, based on the evidence presented, made it mandatory
that the legitimate winner of the election in the State of Florida
appeal the Florida State Supreme Court's corrupt decision, to the U.S. Supreme
Court.
