godless to goddess?

godless to goddess?

this too is probably going to be a biggie. much ground to cover, and many stages to be set. and we also have the assignment of revealing the other two roosters. any y'all know what that means, in the spiritual realm? when some girlie male chickens started messing around with some of god's chicks, the rooster stepped up to the plate, and crowed, and feathers flew all over the damn world, and made one hell of a mess; ergo the messiah. but we are no where near those scenes, yet.

it has come to my attention that god's complaint box overflowed, and again, as so often in the past, the throne room looked like this fucked up world, to the casual observer; dysfunctional as hell.

the first thing that needs to be cleared up, in so far as cleaning the air, so to speak, is repsonsiblity. this centers around the hope that "the truth will set you free." my truth will not set you free, and your truth will not set me free. seems that many in this world want me set free, from my assigned tasks. that will not work. no one will be the freer.

that just proves the point that when we are in that sympathetic mode, for others, we are looking in the wrong direction. a searching and fearless moral inventory, about me, not you. and continued to take personal inventory,...

now another very important issue. am really short on experience on this matter, but a vital truth is going to be discussed. confessions of shortcomings. don't know how many religions of the world have confession in their doctrine, but the roman catholic church is well known for that doctrinal issue.

but anonymous recovery demands much more than that. admitted to god, and another human being, the exact nature of our wrongs. but watch out, that is all inclusive, and demands individual responsibility, not collective admissions, unless it has an anonymous responsibility attached to it, for others; agape responsibility.

now the stage is set for god, to hear all of our bullshit. number one, he is not a liar. number two, god has never told a single secret, period. and that means whether he was told in confidence or not. the thought comes to mind, again, how satan can almost imitate god, for god's ultimate plan and purpose. most will probably not believe this.

god let satan pose as god, to convince all of the elders that all the anonymous talk sixty some years ago was nothing but a fad, that would soon pass away. none of the elders have ever known anything about anonymous recovery, and had never even heard of the bigbook, what so ever!

seems that there must have been a patron saint, in antiquity, that mentioned to god, and god alone, the importance of anonymity, for the success of godliness, the godhead. god coming to the fore front of our JUST being. that is the only way for the new name to be inscribed on our forehead, which is also biblical prophecy.

along that same front, it also seems that the main reason that dummy was chosen was due to the fact that his very own brother did not even know about a very prestigious american achievement that his younger brother had been awarded, eight years earlier. to support that opinion, lets see if you can spot the anonymity principle, about not telling anyone of a good deed, in the following scripture:

But he wanted to justify himself, so he asked Jesus, "And who is my neighbor?"
In reply Jesus said: "A man was going down from Jerusalem to Jericho, when he fell into the hands of robbers. They stripped him of his clothes, beat him and went away, leaving him half dead. A priest happened to be going down the same road, and when he saw the man, he passed by on the other side. So too, a Levite, when he came to the place and saw him, passed by on the other side. But a Samaritan, [scribe's note: half-breed] as he traveled, came where the man was; and when he saw him, he took pity on him. He went to him and bandaged his wounds, pouring on oil and wine. Then he put the man on his own donkey, took him to an inn and took care of him. The next day he took out two silver coins and gave them to the innkeeper. 'Look after him,' he said, 'and when I return, I will reimburse you for any extra expense you may have.'" (Luke 10:29-35 NIV)

the only reason that it has never been mentioned, in public, is that it is god's doings, because of my being chosen. it is not my self that deserves the credit, and i am fully aware of that perfect truth.

lets see if we can get a few more feathers to fly. since they have been given the "heads up," doubt that they will be too upset, if at all. they will know this truth, and take the appropriate action, pronto. god wants All, in all cultures to know that there is only one heavenly FATHER. that's the second crow. wonder who is going to be the third? also, am wondering when we are going to enter the land of the topic, for discussion?

most of you know about my surname. lets change horses, in the middle of the stream, and see what direction we head in, and to what destiny. the other half of my ancestry is scotch-irish. but never drank scotch at all. too damn medicinal, for me. i was a fun loving drunk. keep your legs crossed ladies. oops, god told me to back up, just a touch:

john boy, need a favor.

since my surname is from French decent, was totally ashamed when I learned who and what the "marque de sade" was!

at age seventy, or so, he had a thirteen year old, as his lover, doing the thing that seems to be so objectionable, to so many women. my opinion is that some like it and some hate it.

but the favor is, please tell Christine, if she ever gets one of those offers, to go out to coffee, from any of us French men, WATCH OUT.

e-mail:
9.28.07
8:34pm

it may be that this investigation, that gives little comfort to me, since i am not informed about much, along this train of thought, will not be understood, unless you ask god to help you speak in some kind of strange tongue; that is certainly best for pure lovers though. :-) let's try a little dialect, for a change. how about, "wha thaa 'll da allll bouut?"

how many have seen "brave heart?"

anybody got an idea of what's happening? what is the difference in the words, in our topic? the only difference is that a "d" replaces the "l."   the rest of the word stays the same, but there are tremendous differences in connotation, from god's perspective.

oh shit, here comes the third crow, and this one may take more than many thousand of years to be reconciled, only god knows, for sure.

well done, mel et al. seems as though many from their stock took great pride in righteousness - perfect bravery and courage, and seems also that god may desire a goddess, from that same stock, or culture, or dialect, or nationality, for his very own.

now, a very sensitive issue. this is for the ladies, that god sees. not the dignity of dirt that dummy sees, for sure. y'all won't believe the discussions that have been brokered, by whom, we have not a clue, with agents and/or principles of the throne room. this is very positively secret shit. so listen up, please. it is very true that the core issue of man is the seed of christ, or what ever they call it, in other spiritual circles, that are more advanced, than ole dummy is privileged to know about.

but ladies are entirely different, maybe even we could say perfectly different.

their only core issue is their clit, and therefore their seed of christ.

dummy's only response is, piss on all of 'em.

prophecy, for the end of the first one hundred years: 85% on board now, but problems even then. stop. three political parties. stop. republican. stop. libertarian. stop. conservative. stop.