fulfilled mansions '09 archieve index information PLUS

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights,..." [not from creator, ALL WRONG.]

$
"The Web is not all done, it's just the tip of the iceberg," Berners-Lee said. "I am convinced that the new changes are going to rock the world even more." more them'uns try ramrod change, GREATER hope "is" @ archives webpage. :-) x 3 "...fulfilled what the Scriptures said: 'they hated me without cause.' " 24 museums probably hated MOSTEST. :-)
$

satan's piss ant new world order NO match for god FLATION "new universe" ORDER; without current 'univer'sity TYPES. :-)

equal "RIGHTS," not preferential 'CRIME;' sure to follow.

'09 A.D.FULFILLED MANSIONS ARCHIVES CONTENTS INDEX

Rules of Engagement: '09

priderest evah - "si" 'I AM' : liv'en GOOD purpose, UNDER all conditions - step ten; recent days. :-( x 3

"THE" man was assured, nothink ever get to supremes. [surprise, 3/13/03]

ole dummy like 'go for gold,' bestest. "POT" :-)

         *     *

no titanicable ICE even "seeable" YET. :-)

3

Potpourri

MISC.

Heaven   Bound

right on { :-) * }

hope we get it right
$12th
07/'08 & '09 1 2 3 4

hala*

PLEASE LISTEN .flv

commentary 1 2 3
employ/develop
environmentalists
health care 1
hope "A"
insanity
poverty

repentance
talk radio vids right
winning ** ** **

toppest ten 2 3
global threats 2

global warming 2

Multiculturalism 1hr
bigbook alt or
CONSTITUTION '13'* 3
the good book

easy? sew HIS word

compassion

Nationality
best news '2' "y-tube"

prayer is needed "I"
Muslim Takeover
information II

true truth! "TOO!*"

Constitution Society

CHANGE: edit'en

3/15 23:10 518.7++

No. 08A524 ":-)"

UNANIMITY

it's on. :-)

[let it begin.:-)]

wonder if god wins

pro"c"'es's. :-)$

[ bonus :-) ]

9/13 * :-)

click a color dictionary *

wiki

bestest view

low cost users

tight security? [list * ]

EYES/EARS OPEN
beaconists

real economics A

ides of march, not far: ?

tax & spend LAW

edit * sequel combo

chart graph link 4 sinless 6/7

"Neighbors!" [incessants!]

'autumn,' AGAIN. :-)

thugs/community organizers/card check wanna bes, probably get reaper visit.

god's HEALINGS lets "repentees" WALK. :-)

' "...even without the promise of cold beer.” ' :-) x 27 [plus uno. :-) ]global warming, basement. :-) "BREATHLESS, I TELL YA, 'JUS BREATHLESS." ['YOU BETCHA'. :-) ] 2 browsers? compare populations; '08 estimate. :-) ole dummy keen EYE for "top" billing ADVERTISING dollyers! :-) '03 -'06 population by state. [ manag'en - contol - sum book marks. :-) ] enough prayer - repentance :-) - will bury this SUCKER. maybe just agua - not ice, today - chill down java; sum mooores HOT cappuccino - too? :-) still winter time, summer degree weather show up, go shopping sumthink to eat, need get god remind u'uns, still winter; soup, for cold rainy day. :-) silver lining: counters get'en sum breaks; not work sooo hard. for really heavy load - oxen types (yokes) , probably need 'bigbook/dictionary/constitution/bible,' for sum, ok? [ rise/shine victors. :-) ] for over six thousand years, world tarnished, deceived. long haul ahead, heavy load. time for god's folks to 'rise, and shine.' best/only way, to victory, as individuals, embrace, add on to what you KNOW is right; anonymous recovery, for pure heart, spiritual love/worship. shucks, y'all'uns know bestest - sum, not all - "baseline" report'en where bee found, ya hear? ["...over at the leftarded MSNBC." :-) ] on other hand, full court press, full steam ahead, all 'revoltisms' ok?   huge 'international' SWINDLE: probably "few" years for depositions. [easy does it.]

probably never have enough courage to tell you'uns what hits are. god gave ole dummy multiplier, for new analytical 'prowess.' [ most definitely laughed off net.]

addendum 2 3 recovery	1 2 3 4 5	links a	1 2	need SUM energy? 'freshment too	THANKS	MEDITATION

what really happen in the middle east?		jihad	OBSESSION "their site" OPPRESSION		jimma's war	islamic mein kampf

seems counters not taken break, suckers broken. downward 'fall' since 400+ count'en - sayz 3/14 260 mil. "god sayz" high 300 bln, two other days, today too.

Acceptable Acceptance American Anger Anti-Christ Apostles Ark Armageddon Beginning Bible Study Bible Verses Blame Change Contact Contact Creation Cupid Decision Death Dependence E-Zine Faith Fear Focus Forgiveness Friend Fullness of God Full Promises Full Purpose Giving Global Steps God's Plan Good News Happiness Harm's Way Heart Heaven Hope Home Horrors Human Nature Humility Humor In Touch Literature Living Water Manic Depressive Merchandise New Jerusalem New Life Pain Patience Pleasures Power Prayer Promises Purpose Rebirth Religion Repentance Resentment Rope Sanity Selfishness Selflessness II Servant Sin Spiritual Dictionary Suffering Terrorism The self Trust Truth Twelve Uselessness Violence Voice [speech] We Are Wisdom Worship

read bible in a year spiritual principles global noahhite campus architectural perspective noahhite spiritual vacation resort

Twin Cities . com [opinion]

"This should surprise no one. Compulsion - [ LIKE islam, "SCRIBE'S" edit'en :-) ] - pervades unions' comeback effort. "Free Choice Act"? Free choices underlay unions' trouble, and they know it." thanks, "Lucianne" ™

Patrick McIlheran: Unions have a problem with free choice

By Patrick McIlheran

Posted: 03/15/2009 12:01:00 AM CDT

President Barack Obama, once foursquare for repealing workers' right to a secret vote on unionizing, now seems to be looking for a way out of his promise. But most congressional Democrats look like they'll insist, since unions are insisting.
As long as we're having a new New Deal, unions see this "card check" law as the 1930s recrudesced, a moment to bounce back from the depths of enrolling only 7.6 percent of the private work force. On the Employee Free Choice Act, unions are not asking; they're telling.
This should surprise no one. Compulsion pervades unions' comeback effort. "Free Choice Act"? Free choices underlay unions' trouble, and they know it.
But "choice" sounds good, so unions say the new law would let employees choose whether to vote on unionizing. It does no such thing. The law declares that once a union collects signed cards from half the employees it wants to organize, regulators "shall not declare an election" but must say the union wins.
Unions needn't even tell all the employees. In 2007, nurses in suburban Los Angeles who opposed unionization complained that they never were told the drive was taking place, since organizers circulated cards only to known backers. The union got the employer to keep mum, too.
Silencing the employer is a key aim. Unions say that secret votes aren't really free because employees are given too much information by employers. The boss can order employees to come to anti-union meetings, for instance.
Solely by settling the matter with cards before the employer catches on could things be fair, they say.
Only, as labor lawyers point out, bosses may order employees to an anti-union meeting, but they can't fire them for not showing up. That's illegal. They can tell employees that unionizing might make the plant less competitive, but they can't say they'll close it. The National Labor Relations Board can and does declare the union triumphant, without a vote, for such company misdeeds.
As to whether collecting publicly signed cards amounts to a free choice, it's telling that there's a series of cases revolving around card tricks. One dodge found in NLRB complaints is the raffle: Unions invite prospects to a meeting, where there's a drawing for a door prize. But read carefully the small print on the entry you must sign. One Minnesota case involved union organizers going to employees' homes at night in pairs, saying the company needed a benefits form signed. Well, no. On Tuesday, Congress heard from an Indiana man who repeatedly rebuffed organizers — until one told him that the card drive won and he had to sign simply to get his "information in the system." Untrue, but it worked.
These are the reasons courts repeatedly have said that only secret elections are reliable. Oddly, unions concede this. They now may seek an election once they have cards from 30 percent of employees. They never do. The Teamsters tell organizers to shoot for 65 percent; the Service Employees International Union says "it's unwise" to go to a vote without 70 percent. They know lots of signatures were given just to make organizers buzz off.
Fundamentally, these unions do not think they'll fare as well under uncoerced conditions.
That's a pity in that unions presumably do offer some real benefit to those who belong, as I, grudgingly, do. If so, you'd think they could make their case without betraying democracy.
But the fact is that even if their law is triumphant and unions again have the whip hand, it won't usher us back to the golden 1950s, when the benefits were rich and the jobs permanent. As Brink Lindsey pointed out in an insightful new paper for the Cato Institute, what's changed since that era of "nostalgianomics" hasn't been labor law but, instead, an end to the old New Deal's pervasive cartelization of the American economy.
Where once prices were regulated, lending limited, trade tariffed and top-earning entrepreneurs taxed at 91 percent, this leashing of competition faded in the 1970s and 1980s. Liberalization gave customers choices. It also meant that buyers once captive to businesses extracting high prices to fund union bounty were free to go elsewhere.
Choice, that is, won. It will go on winning unless the country's prepared to coerce itself on matters far broader than just union elections.
Patrick McIlheran is an editorial columnist for the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. His e-mail address is pmcilheran@journalsentinel.com